X-Git-Url: https://git.llucax.com/software/libev.git/blobdiff_plain/f948434612a8b576f115f1fcb64b1db48af3d07e..b5f3175db054d9930a6e75d2034e367b36e875b8:/ev.html?ds=inline diff --git a/ev.html b/ev.html index a3813a2..b82e54e 100644 --- a/ev.html +++ b/ev.html @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ - +
@@ -37,6 +37,8 @@NOTE: This callback must always return a time that is later than the
-passed now
value. Not even now
itself will do, it must be larger.
now
value. Not even now
itself will do, it must be larger.
This can be used to create very complex timers, such as a timer that
triggers on each midnight, local time. To do this, you would calculate the
-next midnight after now
and return the timestamp value for this. How you do this
-is, again, up to you (but it is not trivial).
now
and return the timestamp value for this. How
+you do this is, again, up to you (but it is not trivial, which is the main
+reason I omitted it as an example).
@@ -675,7 +678,7 @@ believe me.
ev_prepare
and ev_check
- customise your event loopPrepare and check watchers are usually (but not always) used in tandem: -Prepare watchers get invoked before the process blocks and check watchers +prepare watchers get invoked before the process blocks and check watchers afterwards.
Their main purpose is to integrate other event mechanisms into libev. This
could be used, for example, to track variable changes, implement your own
@@ -686,16 +689,16 @@ them and starting an ev_timer
watcher for any timeouts (many librar
provide just this functionality). Then, in the check watcher you check for
any events that occured (by checking the pending status of all watchers
and stopping them) and call back into the library. The I/O and timer
-callbacks will never actually be called (but must be valid neverthelles,
+callbacks will never actually be called (but must be valid nevertheless,
because you never know, you know?).
As another example, the Perl Coro module uses these hooks to integrate coroutines into libev programs, by yielding to other active coroutines during each prepare and only letting the process block if no coroutines -are ready to run (its actually more complicated, it only runs coroutines -with priority higher than the event loop and one lower priority once, -using idle watchers to keep the event loop from blocking if lower-priority -coroutines exist, thus mapping low-priority coroutines to idle/background -tasks).
+are ready to run (it's actually more complicated: it only runs coroutines +with priority higher than or equal to the event loop and one coroutine +of lower priority, but only once, using idle watchers to keep the event +loop from blocking if lower-priority coroutines are active, thus mapping +low-priority coroutines to idle/background tasks).TBD.
+ +TBD.
+