Add some missing posts

[personal/website.git] / source / blog / posts / 2009 / 08 / allocations-graphs.rst

diff --git a/source/blog/posts/2009/08/allocations-graphs.rst b/source/blog/posts/2009/08/allocations-graphs.rst
index 00190c92d3adfa3f30654a679a907ea4feb35c31..bf8a23ce5969b0f53913f75fbcdd9f2c6f6ee7eb 100644 (file)
--- a/source/blog/posts/2009/08/allocations-graphs.rst
+++ b/source/blog/posts/2009/08/allocations-graphs.rst
@@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ Again, all graphs (as the graph title says), are taken using the `Naive GC`__
 (stats code still not public yet :) and you can find the code for it in my `D
 GC benchmark`__ repository.
 
-__ https://git.llucax.com.ar/w/software/dgc/naive.git
-__ https://git.llucax.com.ar/w/software/dgc/dgcbench.git
+__ https://git.llucax.com/w/software/dgc/naive.git
+__ https://git.llucax.com/w/software/dgc/dgcbench.git
 
 This time the (big) graphs are in EPS format because I could render them in PNG
 as big as I wanted and I didn't had the time to fix that =S
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ histogram of cell sizes. The histogram differentiates cells with and without
 the ``NO_SCAN`` bit, which might be useful in terms on seeing how bad the
 effect of false positives could be.
 
-__ https://git.llucax.com.ar/w/software/dgc/naive.git
+__ https://git.llucax.com/w/software/dgc/naive.git
 
 You can easily see how allocation time peeks match allocations that triggered
 a collection for example, and how bad can it be the effect of false positives,