*** empty log message ***

[software/libev.git] / ev.pod

diff --git a/ev.pod b/ev.pod
index 62a8299c0b6adc2e616868d84fe1901247a9b320..ee17cb29ba1c36ddefd8663e03b032d9dc6a09e5 100644 (file)
--- a/ev.pod
+++ b/ev.pod
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ support for multiple event loops, then all functions taking an initial
 argument of name C<loop> (which is always of type C<struct ev_loop *>)
 will not have this argument.
 
 argument of name C<loop> (which is always of type C<struct ev_loop *>)
 will not have this argument.
 

-=head1 TIME AND OTHER GLOBAL FUNCTIONS
+=head1 TIME REPRESENTATION

 
 Libev represents time as a single floating point number, representing the
 (fractional) number of seconds since the (POSIX) epoch (somewhere near
 
 Libev represents time as a single floating point number, representing the
 (fractional) number of seconds since the (POSIX) epoch (somewhere near


@@ -49,6 +49,11 @@ the beginning of 1970, details are complicated, don't ask). This type is
 called C<ev_tstamp>, which is what you should use too. It usually aliases
 to the double type in C.
 
 called C<ev_tstamp>, which is what you should use too. It usually aliases
 to the double type in C.
 

+=head1 GLOBAL FUNCTIONS
+
+These functions can be called anytime, even before initialising the
+library in any way.
+

 =over 4
 
 =item ev_tstamp ev_time ()
 =over 4
 
 =item ev_tstamp ev_time ()


@@ -101,7 +106,7 @@ types of such loops, the I<default> loop, which supports signals and child
 events, and dynamically created loops which do not.
 
 If you use threads, a common model is to run the default event loop
 events, and dynamically created loops which do not.
 
 If you use threads, a common model is to run the default event loop

-in your main thread (or in a separate thrad) and for each thread you
+in your main thread (or in a separate thread) and for each thread you

 create, you also create another event loop. Libev itself does no locking
 whatsoever, so if you mix calls to the same event loop in different
 threads, make sure you lock (this is usually a bad idea, though, even if
 create, you also create another event loop. Libev itself does no locking
 whatsoever, so if you mix calls to the same event loop in different
 threads, make sure you lock (this is usually a bad idea, though, even if


@@ -301,16 +306,16 @@ As long as your watcher is active (has been started but not stopped) you
 must not touch the values stored in it. Most specifically you must never
 reinitialise it or call its set method.
 
 must not touch the values stored in it. Most specifically you must never
 reinitialise it or call its set method.
 

-You cna check whether an event is active by calling the C<ev_is_active
+You can check whether an event is active by calling the C<ev_is_active

 (watcher *)> macro. To see whether an event is outstanding (but the
 (watcher *)> macro. To see whether an event is outstanding (but the

-callback for it has not been called yet) you cna use the C<ev_is_pending
+callback for it has not been called yet) you can use the C<ev_is_pending

 (watcher *)> macro.
 
 Each and every callback receives the event loop pointer as first, the
 registered watcher structure as second, and a bitset of received events as
 third argument.
 
 (watcher *)> macro.
 
 Each and every callback receives the event loop pointer as first, the
 registered watcher structure as second, and a bitset of received events as
 third argument.
 

-The rceeived events usually include a single bit per event type received
+The received events usually include a single bit per event type received

 (you can receive multiple events at the same time). The possible bit masks
 are:
 
 (you can receive multiple events at the same time). The possible bit masks
 are:
 


@@ -374,7 +379,7 @@ programs, though, so beware.
 =head2 ASSOCIATING CUSTOM DATA WITH A WATCHER
 
 Each watcher has, by default, a member C<void *data> that you can change
 =head2 ASSOCIATING CUSTOM DATA WITH A WATCHER
 
 Each watcher has, by default, a member C<void *data> that you can change

-and read at any time, libev will completely ignore it. This cna be used
+and read at any time, libev will completely ignore it. This can be used

 to associate arbitrary data with your watcher. If you need more data and
 don't want to allocate memory and store a pointer to it in that data
 member, you can also "subclass" the watcher type and provide your own
 to associate arbitrary data with your watcher. If you need more data and
 don't want to allocate memory and store a pointer to it in that data
 member, you can also "subclass" the watcher type and provide your own


@@ -411,7 +416,7 @@ information given in the last section.
 I/O watchers check whether a file descriptor is readable or writable
 in each iteration of the event loop (This behaviour is called
 level-triggering because you keep receiving events as long as the
 I/O watchers check whether a file descriptor is readable or writable
 in each iteration of the event loop (This behaviour is called
 level-triggering because you keep receiving events as long as the

-condition persists. Remember you cna stop the watcher if you don't want to
+condition persists. Remember you can stop the watcher if you don't want to

 act on the event and neither want to receive future events).
 
 In general you can register as many read and/or write event watchers oer
 act on the event and neither want to receive future events).
 
 In general you can register as many read and/or write event watchers oer


@@ -497,7 +502,7 @@ the timer, and again will automatically restart it if need be.
 
 =back
 
 
 =back
 

-=head2 C<ev_periodic> - to cron or not to cron it
+=head2 C<ev_periodic> - to cron or not to cron

 
 Periodic watchers are also timers of a kind, but they are very versatile
 (and unfortunately a bit complex).
 
 Periodic watchers are also timers of a kind, but they are very versatile
 (and unfortunately a bit complex).


@@ -560,14 +565,12 @@ ignored. Instead, each time the periodic watcher gets scheduled, the
 reschedule callback will be called with the watcher as first, and the
 current time as second argument.
 
 reschedule callback will be called with the watcher as first, and the
 current time as second argument.
 

-NOTE: I<This callback MUST NOT stop or destroy the periodic or any other
-periodic watcher, ever, or make any event loop modifications>. If you need
-to stop it, return C<now + 1e30> (or so, fudge fudge) and stop it afterwards.
-
-Also, I<<this callback must always return a time that is later than the
-passed C<now> value >>. Not even C<now> itself will be ok.
+NOTE: I<This callback MUST NOT stop or destroy any periodic watcher,
+ever, or make any event loop modifications>. If you need to stop it,
+return C<now + 1e30> (or so, fudge fudge) and stop it afterwards (e.g. by
+starting a prepare watcher).

 
 

-Its prototype is c<ev_tstamp (*reschedule_cb)(struct ev_periodic *w,
+Its prototype is C<ev_tstamp (*reschedule_cb)(struct ev_periodic *w,

 ev_tstamp now)>, e.g.:
 
    static ev_tstamp my_rescheduler (struct ev_periodic *w, ev_tstamp now)
 ev_tstamp now)>, e.g.:
 
    static ev_tstamp my_rescheduler (struct ev_periodic *w, ev_tstamp now)


@@ -580,10 +583,14 @@ It must return the next time to trigger, based on the passed time value
 will usually be called just before the callback will be triggered, but
 might be called at other times, too.
 
 will usually be called just before the callback will be triggered, but
 might be called at other times, too.
 

+NOTE: I<< This callback must always return a time that is later than the
+passed C<now> value >>. Not even C<now> itself will do, it I<must> be larger.
+

 This can be used to create very complex timers, such as a timer that
 triggers on each midnight, local time. To do this, you would calculate the
 This can be used to create very complex timers, such as a timer that
 triggers on each midnight, local time. To do this, you would calculate the

-next midnight after C<now> and return the timestamp value for this. How you do this
-is, again, up to you (but it is not trivial).
+next midnight after C<now> and return the timestamp value for this. How
+you do this is, again, up to you (but it is not trivial, which is the main
+reason I omitted it as an example).

 
 =back
 
 
 =back
 


@@ -603,7 +610,7 @@ signal one or more times. Even though signals are very asynchronous, libev
 will try it's best to deliver signals synchronously, i.e. as part of the
 normal event processing, like any other event.
 
 will try it's best to deliver signals synchronously, i.e. as part of the
 normal event processing, like any other event.
 

-You cna configure as many watchers as you like per signal. Only when the
+You can configure as many watchers as you like per signal. Only when the

 first watcher gets started will libev actually register a signal watcher
 with the kernel (thus it coexists with your own signal handlers as long
 as you don't register any with libev). Similarly, when the last signal
 first watcher gets started will libev actually register a signal watcher
 with the kernel (thus it coexists with your own signal handlers as long
 as you don't register any with libev). Similarly, when the last signal


@@ -635,18 +642,21 @@ some child status changes (most typically when a child of yours dies).
 Configures the watcher to wait for status changes of process C<pid> (or
 I<any> process if C<pid> is specified as C<0>). The callback can look
 at the C<rstatus> member of the C<ev_child> watcher structure to see
 Configures the watcher to wait for status changes of process C<pid> (or
 I<any> process if C<pid> is specified as C<0>). The callback can look
 at the C<rstatus> member of the C<ev_child> watcher structure to see

-the status word (use the macros from C<sys/wait.h>). The C<rpid> member
-contains the pid of the process causing the status change.
+the status word (use the macros from C<sys/wait.h> and see your systems
+C<waitpid> documentation). The C<rpid> member contains the pid of the
+process causing the status change.

 
 =back
 
 =head2 C<ev_idle> - when you've got nothing better to do
 
 
 =back
 
 =head2 C<ev_idle> - when you've got nothing better to do
 

-Idle watchers trigger events when there are no other I/O or timer (or
-periodic) events pending. That is, as long as your process is busy
-handling sockets or timeouts it will not be called. But when your process
-is idle all idle watchers are being called again and again - until
-stopped, that is, or your process receives more events.
+Idle watchers trigger events when there are no other events are pending
+(prepare, check and other idle watchers do not count). That is, as long
+as your process is busy handling sockets or timeouts (or even signals,
+imagine) it will not be triggered. But when your process is idle all idle
+watchers are being called again and again, once per event loop iteration -
+until stopped, that is, or your process receives more events and becomes
+busy.

 
 The most noteworthy effect is that as long as any idle watchers are
 active, the process will not block when waiting for new events.
 
 The most noteworthy effect is that as long as any idle watchers are
 active, the process will not block when waiting for new events.


@@ -666,27 +676,33 @@ believe me.
 
 =back
 
 
 =back
 

-=head2 prepare and check - your hooks into the event loop
+=head2 C<ev_prepare> and C<ev_check> - customise your event loop

 
 

-Prepare and check watchers usually (but not always) are used in
-tandom. Prepare watchers get invoked before the process blocks and check
-watchers afterwards.
+Prepare and check watchers are usually (but not always) used in tandem:
+prepare watchers get invoked before the process blocks and check watchers
+afterwards.

 
 Their main purpose is to integrate other event mechanisms into libev. This
 could be used, for example, to track variable changes, implement your own
 watchers, integrate net-snmp or a coroutine library and lots more.
 
 This is done by examining in each prepare call which file descriptors need
 
 Their main purpose is to integrate other event mechanisms into libev. This
 could be used, for example, to track variable changes, implement your own
 watchers, integrate net-snmp or a coroutine library and lots more.
 
 This is done by examining in each prepare call which file descriptors need

-to be watched by the other library, registering C<ev_io> watchers for them
-and starting an C<ev_timer> watcher for any timeouts (many libraries provide
-just this functionality). Then, in the check watcher you check for any
-events that occured (by making your callbacks set soem flags for example)
-and call back into the library.
-
-As another example, the perl Coro module uses these hooks to integrate
+to be watched by the other library, registering C<ev_io> watchers for
+them and starting an C<ev_timer> watcher for any timeouts (many libraries
+provide just this functionality). Then, in the check watcher you check for
+any events that occured (by checking the pending status of all watchers
+and stopping them) and call back into the library. The I/O and timer
+callbacks will never actually be called (but must be valid nevertheless,
+because you never know, you know?).
+
+As another example, the Perl Coro module uses these hooks to integrate

 coroutines into libev programs, by yielding to other active coroutines
 during each prepare and only letting the process block if no coroutines
 coroutines into libev programs, by yielding to other active coroutines
 during each prepare and only letting the process block if no coroutines

-are ready to run.
+are ready to run (it's actually more complicated: it only runs coroutines
+with priority higher than or equal to the event loop and one coroutine
+of lower priority, but only once, using idle watchers to keep the event
+loop from blocking if lower-priority coroutines are active, thus mapping
+low-priority coroutines to idle/background tasks).

 
 =over 4
 
 
 =over 4
 


@@ -696,13 +712,13 @@ are ready to run.
 
 Initialises and configures the prepare or check watcher - they have no
 parameters of any kind. There are C<ev_prepare_set> and C<ev_check_set>
 
 Initialises and configures the prepare or check watcher - they have no
 parameters of any kind. There are C<ev_prepare_set> and C<ev_check_set>

-macros, but using them is utterly, utterly pointless.
+macros, but using them is utterly, utterly and completely pointless.

 
 =back
 
 =head1 OTHER FUNCTIONS
 
 
 =back
 
 =head1 OTHER FUNCTIONS
 

-There are some other fucntions of possible interest. Described. Here. Now.
+There are some other functions of possible interest. Described. Here. Now.

 
 =over 4
 
 
 =over 4
 


@@ -714,37 +730,40 @@ watchers. This is useful if you want to wait for a single event on an fd
 or timeout without havign to allocate/configure/start/stop/free one or
 more watchers yourself.
 
 or timeout without havign to allocate/configure/start/stop/free one or
 more watchers yourself.
 

-If C<fd> is less than 0, then no I/O watcher will be started and events is
-ignored. Otherwise, an C<ev_io> watcher for the given C<fd> and C<events> set
-will be craeted and started.
+If C<fd> is less than 0, then no I/O watcher will be started and events
+is being ignored. Otherwise, an C<ev_io> watcher for the given C<fd> and
+C<events> set will be craeted and started.

 
 If C<timeout> is less than 0, then no timeout watcher will be
 
 If C<timeout> is less than 0, then no timeout watcher will be

-started. Otherwise an C<ev_timer> watcher with after = C<timeout> (and repeat
-= 0) will be started.
+started. Otherwise an C<ev_timer> watcher with after = C<timeout> (and
+repeat = 0) will be started. While C<0> is a valid timeout, it is of
+dubious value.

 
 

-The callback has the type C<void (*cb)(int revents, void *arg)> and
-gets passed an events set (normally a combination of C<EV_ERROR>, C<EV_READ>,
-C<EV_WRITE> or C<EV_TIMEOUT>) and the C<arg> value passed to C<ev_once>:
+The callback has the type C<void (*cb)(int revents, void *arg)> and gets
+passed an events set like normal event callbacks (with a combination of
+C<EV_ERROR>, C<EV_READ>, C<EV_WRITE> or C<EV_TIMEOUT>) and the C<arg>
+value passed to C<ev_once>:

 
   static void stdin_ready (int revents, void *arg)
   {
     if (revents & EV_TIMEOUT)
 
   static void stdin_ready (int revents, void *arg)
   {
     if (revents & EV_TIMEOUT)

-      /* doh, nothing entered */
+      /* doh, nothing entered */;

     else if (revents & EV_READ)
     else if (revents & EV_READ)

-      /* stdin might have data for us, joy! */
+      /* stdin might have data for us, joy! */;

   }
 
   }
 

-  ev_once (STDIN_FILENO, EV_READm 10., stdin_ready, 0);
+  ev_once (STDIN_FILENO, EV_READ, 10., stdin_ready, 0);

 
 =item ev_feed_event (loop, watcher, int events)
 
 Feeds the given event set into the event loop, as if the specified event
 
 =item ev_feed_event (loop, watcher, int events)
 
 Feeds the given event set into the event loop, as if the specified event

-has happened for the specified watcher (which must be a pointer to an
-initialised but not necessarily active event watcher).
+had happened for the specified watcher (which must be a pointer to an
+initialised but not necessarily started event watcher).

 
 =item ev_feed_fd_event (loop, int fd, int revents)
 
 
 =item ev_feed_fd_event (loop, int fd, int revents)
 

-Feed an event on the given fd, as if a file descriptor backend detected it.
+Feed an event on the given fd, as if a file descriptor backend detected
+the given events it.

 
 =item ev_feed_signal_event (loop, int signum)
 
 
 =item ev_feed_signal_event (loop, int signum)
 


@@ -752,6 +771,14 @@ Feed an event as if the given signal occured (loop must be the default loop!).
 
 =back
 
 
 =back
 

+=head1 LIBEVENT EMULATION
+
+TBD.
+
+=head1 C++ SUPPORT
+
+TBD.
+

 =head1 AUTHOR
 
 Marc Lehmann <libev@schmorp.de>.
 =head1 AUTHOR
 
 Marc Lehmann <libev@schmorp.de>.