X-Git-Url: https://git.llucax.com/software/libev.git/blobdiff_plain/0af52f411dbf7d205e84883d4557a4af01533ac0..743aec8b44b347a1ca6e491fd90b010d9c2b39ae:/ev.pod diff --git a/ev.pod b/ev.pod index be4196a..cf12f70 100644 --- a/ev.pod +++ b/ev.pod @@ -50,8 +50,12 @@ libev - a high performance full-featured event loop written in C =head1 DESCRIPTION +The newest version of this document is also available as a html-formatted +web page you might find easier to navigate when reading it for the first +time: L. + Libev is an event loop: you register interest in certain events (such as a -file descriptor being readable or a timeout occuring), and it will manage +file descriptor being readable or a timeout occurring), and it will manage these event sources and provide your program with events. To do this, it must take more or less complete control over your process @@ -96,7 +100,9 @@ Libev represents time as a single floating point number, representing the the beginning of 1970, details are complicated, don't ask). This type is called C, which is what you should use too. It usually aliases to the C type in C, and when you need to do any calculations on -it, you should treat it as such. +it, you should treat it as some floatingpoint value. Unlike the name +component C might indicate, it is also used for time differences +throughout libev. =head1 GLOBAL FUNCTIONS @@ -115,14 +121,17 @@ you actually want to know. =item int ev_version_minor () -You can find out the major and minor version numbers of the library +You can find out the major and minor ABI version numbers of the library you linked against by calling the functions C and C. If you want, you can compare against the global symbols C and C, which specify the version of the library your program was compiled against. +These version numbers refer to the ABI version of the library, not the +release version. + Usually, it's a good idea to terminate if the major versions mismatch, -as this indicates an incompatible change. Minor versions are usually +as this indicates an incompatible change. Minor versions are usually compatible to older versions, so a larger minor version alone is usually not a problem. @@ -324,8 +333,8 @@ need to use non-blocking I/O or other means to avoid blocking when no data Kqueue deserves special mention, as at the time of this writing, it was broken on all BSDs except NetBSD (usually it doesn't work with -anything but sockets and pipes, except on Darwin, where of course its -completely useless). For this reason its not being "autodetected" +anything but sockets and pipes, except on Darwin, where of course it's +completely useless). For this reason it's not being "autodetected" unless you explicitly specify it explicitly in the flags (i.e. using C). @@ -397,9 +406,18 @@ etc.). None of the active event watchers will be stopped in the normal sense, so e.g. C might still return true. It is your responsibility to either stop all watchers cleanly yoursef I calling this function, or cope with the fact afterwards (which is usually -the easiest thing, youc na just ignore the watchers and/or C them +the easiest thing, you can just ignore the watchers and/or C them for example). +Note that certain global state, such as signal state, will not be freed by +this function, and related watchers (such as signal and child watchers) +would need to be stopped manually. + +In general it is not advisable to call this function except in the +rare occasion where you really need to free e.g. the signal handling +pipe fds. If you need dynamically allocated loops it is better to use +C and C). + =item ev_loop_destroy (loop) Like C, but destroys an event loop created by an @@ -453,7 +471,7 @@ Returns the current "event loop time", which is the time the event loop received events and started processing them. This timestamp does not change as long as callbacks are being processed, and this is also the base time used for relative timers. You can treat it as the timestamp of the -event occuring (or more correctly, libev finding out about it). +event occurring (or more correctly, libev finding out about it). =item ev_loop (loop, int flags) @@ -484,8 +502,9 @@ usually a better approach for this kind of thing. Here are the gory details of what C does: + - Before the first iteration, call any pending watchers. * If there are no active watchers (reference count is zero), return. - - Queue prepare watchers and then call all outstanding watchers. + - Queue all prepare watchers and then call all outstanding watchers. - If we have been forked, recreate the kernel state. - Update the kernel state with all outstanding changes. - Update the "event loop time". @@ -734,8 +753,9 @@ it. Returns a true value iff the watcher is pending, (i.e. it has outstanding events but its callback has not yet been invoked). As long as a watcher is pending (but not active) you must not call an init function on it (but -C is safe) and you must make sure the watcher is available to -libev (e.g. you cnanot C it). +C is safe), you must not change its priority, and you must +make sure the watcher is available to libev (e.g. you cannot C +it). =item callback ev_cb (ev_TYPE *watcher) @@ -764,6 +784,9 @@ watchers on the same event and make sure one is called first. If you need to suppress invocation when higher priority events are pending you need to look at C watchers, which provide this functionality. +You I change the priority of a watcher as long as it is active or +pending. + The default priority used by watchers when no priority has been set is always C<0>, which is supposed to not be too high and not be too low :). @@ -771,6 +794,18 @@ Setting a priority outside the range of C to C is fine, as long as you do not mind that the priority value you query might or might not have been adjusted to be within valid range. +=item ev_invoke (loop, ev_TYPE *watcher, int revents) + +Invoke the C with the given C and C. Neither +C nor C need to be valid as long as the watcher callback +can deal with that fact. + +=item int ev_clear_pending (loop, ev_TYPE *watcher) + +If the watcher is pending, this function returns clears its pending status +and returns its C bitset (as if its callback was invoked). If the +watcher isn't pending it does nothing and returns C<0>. + =back @@ -885,10 +920,34 @@ C is far preferable to a program hanging until some data arrives. If you cannot run the fd in non-blocking mode (for example you should not play around with an Xlib connection), then you have to seperately re-test -wether a file descriptor is really ready with a known-to-be good interface +whether a file descriptor is really ready with a known-to-be good interface such as poll (fortunately in our Xlib example, Xlib already does this on its own, so its quite safe to use). +=head3 The special problem of disappearing file descriptors + +Some backends (e.g kqueue, epoll) need to be told about closing a file +descriptor (either by calling C explicitly or by any other means, +such as C). The reason is that you register interest in some file +descriptor, but when it goes away, the operating system will silently drop +this interest. If another file descriptor with the same number then is +registered with libev, there is no efficient way to see that this is, in +fact, a different file descriptor. + +To avoid having to explicitly tell libev about such cases, libev follows +the following policy: Each time C is being called, libev +will assume that this is potentially a new file descriptor, otherwise +it is assumed that the file descriptor stays the same. That means that +you I to call C (or C) when you change the +descriptor even if the file descriptor number itself did not change. + +This is how one would do it normally anyway, the important point is that +the libev application should not optimise around libev but should leave +optimisations to libev. + + +=head3 Watcher-Specific Functions + =over 4 =item ev_io_init (ev_io *, callback, int fd, int events) @@ -951,6 +1010,8 @@ The callback is guarenteed to be invoked only when its timeout has passed, but if multiple timers become ready during the same loop iteration then order of execution is undefined. +=head3 Watcher-Specific Functions and Data Members + =over 4 =item ev_timer_init (ev_timer *, callback, ev_tstamp after, ev_tstamp repeat) @@ -1055,16 +1116,18 @@ to trigger "at" some specific point in time. For example, if you tell a periodic watcher to trigger in 10 seconds (by specifiying e.g. C) and then reset your system clock to the last year, then it will take a year to trigger the event (unlike an C, which would trigger -roughly 10 seconds later and of course not if you reset your system time -again). +roughly 10 seconds later). They can also be used to implement vastly more complex timers, such as -triggering an event on eahc midnight, local time. +triggering an event on each midnight, local time or other, complicated, +rules. As with timers, the callback is guarenteed to be invoked only when the time (C) has been passed, but if multiple periodic timers become ready during the same loop iteration then order of execution is undefined. +=head3 Watcher-Specific Functions and Data Members + =over 4 =item ev_periodic_init (ev_periodic *, callback, ev_tstamp at, ev_tstamp interval, reschedule_cb) @@ -1076,18 +1139,18 @@ operation, and we will explain them from simplest to complex: =over 4 -=item * absolute timer (interval = reschedule_cb = 0) +=item * absolute timer (at = time, interval = reschedule_cb = 0) In this configuration the watcher triggers an event at the wallclock time C and doesn't repeat. It will not adjust when a time jump occurs, that is, if it is to be run at January 1st 2011 then it will run when the system time reaches or surpasses this time. -=item * non-repeating interval timer (interval > 0, reschedule_cb = 0) +=item * non-repeating interval timer (at = offset, interval > 0, reschedule_cb = 0) In this mode the watcher will always be scheduled to time out at the next -C time (for some integer N) and then repeat, regardless -of any time jumps. +C time (for some integer N, which can also be negative) +and then repeat, regardless of any time jumps. This can be used to create timers that do not drift with respect to system time: @@ -1103,7 +1166,11 @@ Another way to think about it (for the mathematically inclined) is that C will try to run the callback in this mode at the next possible time where C