EVMETHOD_SELECT (portable select backend)EVMETHOD_POLL (poll backend, available everywhere except on windows)EVMETHOD_EPOLL (linux only)EVMETHOD_KQUEUE (some bsds only)EVMETHOD_DEVPOLL (solaris 8 only)EVMETHOD_PORT (solaris 10 only)EVMETHOD_SELECT (value 1, portable select backend)If one or more of these are ored into the flags value, then only these -backends will be tried (in the reverse order as given here). If one are -specified, any backend will do.
+This is your standard select(2) backend. Not completely standard, as +libev tries to roll its own fd_set with no limits on the number of fds, +but if that fails, expect a fairly low limit on the number of fds when +using this backend. It doesn't scale too well (O(highest_fd)), but its usually +the fastest backend for a low number of fds.
+EVMETHOD_POLL (value 2, poll backend, available everywhere except on windows)And this is your standard poll(2) backend. It's more complicated than +select, but handles sparse fds better and has no artificial limit on the +number of fds you can use (except it will slow down considerably with a +lot of inactive fds). It scales similarly to select, i.e. O(total_fds).
+EVMETHOD_EPOLL (value 4, Linux)For few fds, this backend is a bit little slower than poll and select, +but it scales phenomenally better. While poll and select usually scale like +O(total_fds) where n is the total number of fds (or the highest fd), epoll scales +either O(1) or O(active_fds).
+While stopping and starting an I/O watcher in the same iteration will +result in some caching, there is still a syscall per such incident +(because the fd could point to a different file description now), so its +best to avoid that. Also, dup()ed file descriptors might not work very +well if you register events for both fds.
+EVMETHOD_KQUEUE (value 8, most BSD clones)Kqueue deserves special mention, as at the time of this writing, it +was broken on all BSDs except NetBSD (usually it doesn't work with +anything but sockets and pipes, except on Darwin, where of course its +completely useless). For this reason its not being "autodetected" unless +you explicitly specify the flags (i.e. you don't use EVFLAG_AUTO).
+It scales in the same way as the epoll backend, but the interface to the +kernel is more efficient (which says nothing about its actual speed, of +course). While starting and stopping an I/O watcher does not cause an +extra syscall as with epoll, it still adds up to four event changes per +incident, so its best to avoid that.
+EVMETHOD_DEVPOLL (value 16, Solaris 8)This is not implemented yet (and might never be).
+EVMETHOD_PORT (value 32, Solaris 10)This uses the Solaris 10 port mechanism. As with everything on Solaris, +it's really slow, but it still scales very well (O(active_fds)).
+EVMETHOD_ALLTry all backends (even potentially broken ones that wouldn't be tried
+with EVFLAG_AUTO). Since this is a mask, you can do stuff such as
+EVMETHOD_ALL & ~EVMETHOD_KQUEUE.
If one or more of these are ored into the flags value, then only these +backends will be tried (in the reverse order as given here). If none are +specified, most compiled-in backend will be tried, usually in reverse +order of their flag values :)
ev_loop_new.
one. Despite the name, you can call it anytime, but it makes most sense
after forking, in either the parent or child process (or both, but that
again makes little sense).
- You must call this function after forking if and only if you want to -use the event library in both processes. If you just fork+exec, you don't -have to call it.
+You must call this function in the child process after forking if and +only if you want to use the event library in both processes. If you just +fork+exec, you don't have to call it.
The function itself is quite fast and it's usually not a problem to call
it just in case after a fork. To make this easy, the function will fit in
quite nicely into a call to pthread_atfork: