make libev safer w.r.t. reentrancy

[software/libev.git] / README

diff --git a/README b/README
index 966604755ff34156e3b4da0824dd47efcd56bd97..4886b2be5e94ef0849267289262b87655a584d9c 100644 (file)
--- a/README
+++ b/README
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
 libev is modelled after libevent (http://monkey.org/~provos/libevent/), but aims
 to be faster and more correct, and also more featureful. Examples:
 
 libev is modelled after libevent (http://monkey.org/~provos/libevent/), but aims
 to be faster and more correct, and also more featureful. Examples:
 

+(comparisons relative to libevent-1.3e and libev-0.00)
+

 - multiple watchers can wait for the same event without deregistering others,
   both for file descriptors as well as signals.
   (registering two read events on fd 10 and unregistering one will not
 - multiple watchers can wait for the same event without deregistering others,
   both for file descriptors as well as signals.
   (registering two read events on fd 10 and unregistering one will not


@@ -50,7 +52,7 @@ to be faster and more correct, and also more featureful. Examples:
 
 - simpler design, backends are potentially much simpler
   (in libevent, backends have to deal with watchers, thus the problems)
 
 - simpler design, backends are potentially much simpler
   (in libevent, backends have to deal with watchers, thus the problems)

-  (epoll backend in libevent: 366 lines, libev: 89 lines, and more features)
+  (epoll backend in libevent: 366 lines, libev: 90 lines, and more features)

 
 whats missing?
 
 
 whats missing?