Table of Contents
+
Table of Contents
Mutt's performance when reading mailboxes can be improved in two ways: -
For remote folders (IMAP and POP) as well as folders using one-file-per message storage (Maildir and MH), mutt's performance can be greatly improved using -header caching. +header caching. Using a single database per folder may further increase performance.
-Mutt provides the $read_inc -and $write_inc +Mutt provides the $read_inc +and $write_inc variables to specify at which rate to update progress counters. If these values are too low, mutt may spend more time on updating the progress counter than it spends on @@ -20,25 +40,22 @@ actually reading/writing folders.
For example, when opening a maildir folder with a few thousand messages, the default value for -$read_inc +$read_inc may be too low. It can be tuned on on a folder-basis using -folder-hooks: - +folder-hooks:
# use very high $read_inc to speed up reading hcache'd maildirs folder-hook . 'set read_inc=1000' # use lower value for reading slower remote IMAP folders folder-hook ^imap 'set read_inc=100' # use even lower value for reading even slower remote POP folders -folder-hook ^pop 'set read_inc=1'
-
-
These settings work on a per-message basis. However, as messages may +folder-hook ^pop 'set read_inc=1'
These settings work on a per-message basis. However, as messages may greatly differ in size and certain operations are much faster than others, even per-folder settings of the increment variables may not be desirable as they produce either too few or too much progress updates. Thus, Mutt allows to limit the number of progress updates per second it'll actually send to the terminal using the -$time_inc variable.
+$time_inc variable.
Reading messages from remote folders such as IMAP an POP can be slow especially for large mailboxes since mutt only caches a very limited number of recently viewed messages (usually 10) per @@ -46,15 +63,15 @@ session (so that it will be gone for the next session.)
To improve performance and permanently cache whole messages, please refer to mutt's so-called -body caching for details. +body caching for details.
When searching mailboxes either via a search or a limit action, for some patterns mutt distinguishes between regular expression and string searches. For regular expressions, patterns are prefixed with -``Ë'' and with ``='' for string searches. +âËâ and with â=â for string searches.
Even though a regular expression search is fast, it's several times -slower than a pure string search which is noticable especially on large +slower than a pure string search which is noticeable especially on large folders. As a consequence, a string search should be used instead of a regular expression search if the user already knows enough about the search pattern.